<a href="https://www.theblaze.com/news/biden-tried-defending-autopen-use-to-the-new-york-times-he-made-it-a-whole-lot-worse" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
The recent revelations surrounding Joe Biden’s use of an autopen for issuing pardons and executive orders have sparked quite the buzz—and not in a good way. With the House Oversight Committee raising eyebrows over Biden’s cognitive abilities and potential cover-ups, the drama thickens with every twist and turn. Did he really sign those pardons, or were they just a high-tech charade? It’s starting to sound like a reality show, minus the rose ceremonies!
Biden’s White House doctor, Kevin O’Connor, took the Fifth when questioned by the committee, which certainly raises a red flag or two. Meanwhile, in a phone interview with the New York Times, Biden asserted he was behind every clemency decision. But wait—emails hinting that his staff, like Stefanie Feldman, might have been playing gatekeeper with the autopen paint a different picture. Can you hear the “who done it” music playing softly in the background?
As the pieces of this puzzle get put together, one has to wonder: how accountable should leaders be for their actions when they lean heavily on technology? As we await further updates, it’s hard not to chuckle at how this saga feels more like a political soap opera than a dignified presidency. What’s next? A tell-all book titled “The Autopen Diaries”?
What do you think? Are we ready to trust a president who might not even hold a pen?
About the Author
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!
